Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 472

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four dimensions

Open access
Kreuzer, Maximilian, Skarke, Harald·2000·Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Abstract

Four dimensional reflexive polyhedra encode the data for smooth Calabi-Yau threefolds that are hypersurfaces in toric varieties, and have important applications both in perturbative and in non-perturbative string theory.We describe how we obtained all 473,800,776 reflexive polyhedra that exist in four dimensions and the 30,108 distinct pairs of Hodge numbers of the resulting Calabi-Yau manifolds.As a byproduct we show that all these spaces (and hence the corresponding string vacua) are connected via a chain of singular transitions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4310/atmp.2000.v4.n6.a2

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 472

Metadata

Authors
Kreuzer, M., & Skarke, H.
Venue
Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics
Published
2000
Volume
4
Issue
6
Pages
1209-1230
ISSN
  • 1095-0753 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-0761
OpenAlex
W2963800692
Cited by
472
References
0
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four dimensions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4310/atmp.2000.v4.n6.a2
The paper
Kreuzer, M., & Skarke, H. (2000). Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four dimensions. Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. https://doi.org/10.4310/atmp.2000.v4.n6.a2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.