Cited by 8Food Safety and HygieneAntibiotic Use and ResistanceSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Knowledge and Perception of Consumers on Microbiological Meat Safety, Antibiotic Resistance and Residues in Tema Metropolis, Ghana

Open access
Anachinaba, I.A., Adzitey, F., Teye, G.A., Brown, C.A., Boateng, E.F.·2022·Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences

Abstract

This study assessed the knowledge and perception of consumers on microbiological meat safety, antibiotic resistance and residues in Tema Metropolis, Ghana. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect information from 384 randomly selected meat consumers on their knowledge and perception of meat safety and antibiotics. Data obtained was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 20 and Chi Square was used to determine relationships among some parameters. The results revealed that 56% were males, with the majority (54%) aged between 21-40 years. Most (51%) of the respondents had basic education. For consumption, most of the respondents preferred chicken (53%) to beef (32%) and pork (14%), mostly because of taste (50%), followed by accessibility (39%) and price (11%). Majority (80%) of the respondents agreed (slightly to strongly agree) that meat consumption is associated with hypertension/high cholesterol and diabetics. Also, most of the respondents had heard about microbiological meat safety (64%) mostly from their teachers in school (62%) and the media (25%). They had also heard about antibiotic resistance (55%) and antibiotic residues (53%), mostly from their teachers in school (56% and 58%, respectively). Generally, most of the respondents did not know much about antibiotic resistance and antibiotic residues, although they had heard about them. The findings of the study warrant the need to educate consumers on food safety and antibiotic related issues.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4314/jafs.v20i1.11

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Anachinaba, I. A., Adzitey, F., Teye, G. A., Brown, C. A., & Boateng, E. F.
Affiliations
  • University for Development Studies (GH)
  • University of Ghana (GH)
  • Nanjing Agricultural University (CN)
Venue
Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences
Published
2022-08-09
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
135-153
ISSN
1597-1074 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4291634406
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Keywords
consumer knowledge, consumer perception, antibiotic resistance, antibiotic residues, meat consumption, food safety awareness, Tema Metropolis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review