Cited by 22Global Health and SurgeryHealth and Medical Research ImpactsBiotechnology and Related Fields

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Correspondence: Strengthening capacity, collaboration and quality of clinical research in Africa: EDCTP Networks of Excellence

Open access
Kitau, A, Corrah, T, Herbst, K, Nyirenda, T, Agwale, S, Makanga, M, Mgone, CS·2009·Tanzania Journal of Health Research

Abstract

Developing countries bear 90% of the global disease burden, but only access about 10% of globally available health research funding. Weak south-south networking hampers effective use of limited resources, production of critical mass of quality scientists, career opportunities and incentives to retain the few available scientists. The south must urgently act strategically to accelerate generation of talented scientists, create enabling environment and incentives to retain scientists and attract back those in diaspora. The creation of strong networks of excellence for clinical research among southern academic and research institutions is a novel strategic approach championed by European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership to achieve the aforementioned goals and mitigate the high disease burden. It will promote strong collaboration, resource sharing and cross-mentorship allowing each partner to grow with complementary capacities that support each other rather than compete negatively. It will enable the south and Africa in particular to participate actively and own the means for solving its own health problems and raise the professional quality and capacity of southern institutions to forge better and equal partnership with northern institutions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4314/thrb.v11i1.43253

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Africa bears up to 90% of the global disease burden but has access to about 10% of global health research funding.

    “Although Africa bears up to 90% of the global disease burden, it only has access to about 10% of global health research funding [40].”

    From The dentist-scientist career pathway in Africa: opportunities and obstacles (2018) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Abstract attributes the 90% disease-burden and 10% research-funding figures to developing countries, not Africa specifically. The Background says Africa accounts for 90% of annual malaria cases, which does not establish its share of the global burden of all diseases. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Weak intra-Africa networking in research and funding has hindered the effective use of limited resources for maximal quality science and career opportunities in Africa, as well as incentives to retain available scientists.

    “Weak intra-Africa networking in the area of research and funding has also hindered the effective use of limited resources for the production of maximal quality science and career opportunities in Africa; as well as incentives to retain the few available scientists [40].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]7. WHO (2002) Reducng Rsks, Promotng Healthy Life. World Health Report 2002.. Pp.102

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kitau, A., Corrah, T., Herbst, K., Nyirenda, T., Agwale, S., Makanga, M., & Mgone, C.
Affiliations
  • European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (NL)
  • Tygerberg Hospital (ZA)
Venue
Tanzania Journal of Health Research
Published
2009-06-04
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
51-4
ISSN
0856-6496 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109711574
Cited by
22
References
4
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tanzania journal of health research/Tanzania Journal of Health Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Biotechnology and Related Fields
Keywords
clinical research capacity building, South-South cooperation, research networks, research collaboration, health research capacity
MeSH terms
Academies and Institutes, Africa, Clinical Trials as Topic, Developing Countries, Education, Graduate, Europe, Humans, International Cooperation, Research Support as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review