Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ingestion by planktonic grazers as a function of concentration of food1

Open access
Mullin, Michael M., Stewart, Elizabeth Fuglister, Fuglister, Frederick J.·1975·Limnology and Oceanography

Abstract

Data on ingestion by copepods as a function of concentration of food were re‐examined with regard to possible mathematical models for this process. A rectilinear model was found preferable, but the hyperbolic models could not be statistically rejected. The choice of a model was particularly crucial at very low concentrations of food.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4319/lo.1975.20.2.0259

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
Mullin, M. M., Stewart, E. F., & Fuglister, F. J.
Venue
Limnology and Oceanography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1975-03
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
259-262
ISSN
  • 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5590
OpenAlex
W2063416100
Cited by
188
References
1
FWCI
7.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ingestion by planktonic grazers as a function of concentration of food1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1975.20.2.0259
The paper
Mullin, M. M., Stewart, E. F., & Fuglister, F. J. (1975). Ingestion by planktonic grazers as a function of concentration of food1. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1975.20.2.0259

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.