Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Daphnia grazing on natural bacteria1

Open access
Peterson, Bruce J., Hobbie, John E., Haney, James F.·1978·Limnology and Oceanography

Abstract

Ten to sixteen Daphnia were placed in small vials filled with natural water from a lake and incubated for 0.5 to 2.0 h. The small (ca. 0.10 µ3) bacteria were counted on Nuclepore filters by an Acridine Orange direct count method with epifluorescence. Filtering rates were calculated from counts of bacteria before and after the incubations. For D. pulex, D. middendorffiana, and D. longiremis the filtering rates ranged from 0.2 to 1.5 · ml animal−1 · h−1 depending on the size of the animal and temperature. Simultaneous comparisons with rates of filtering on larger yeast cells indicated that these bacteria were filtered at about 30% the rate for yeast.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4319/lo.1978.23.5.1039

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Peterson, B. J., Hobbie, J. E., & Haney, J. F.
Venue
Limnology and Oceanography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1978-09
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
1039-1044
ISSN
  • 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5590
OpenAlex
W2023886560
Cited by
170
References
0
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Daphnia grazing on natural bacteria1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1978.23.5.1039
The paper
Peterson, B. J., Hobbie, J. E., & Haney, J. F. (1978). Daphnia grazing on natural bacteria1. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1978.23.5.1039

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.