Cited by 226Geology and Paleoclimatology ResearchGeological formations and processesAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Sediment focusing in Mirror Lake, New Hampshire1

Open access
Davis, Margaret Bryan, Ford, Mary S. (Jesse)·1982·Limnology and Oceanography

Abstract

Analyses of multiple sediment cores from Mirror Lake, New Hampshire, dated by 14C and pollen, show that between 14,000 and 11,000 b.p. silts and sands were deposited over 85% of the basin. After 11,000 b.p. organic-rich sediments were focused into the deeper parts of the basin, and no sediment accumulated in water <5 m deep. Late-glacial particulate inorganic inputs were 33 times greater than modern losses from forested watersheds at Hubbard Brook. After trees became established, inorganic inputs fell sharply to modern levels. Late-glacial organic inputs were a half the average during the last 11,000 years. At four of the sites studied, accumulation rates reached a maximum between 7000 and 4000 b.p. The precise date varies from site to site, suggesting that it would be misleading to link peak accumulation in a single core to events in the watershed. After 4000 b.p. organic sediment accumulation rates declined at all four sites. Parallel declines in accumulation rates of both pollen and inorganic sediments suggest that this decline is due to the process of sediment focusing rather than to a change in decomposition rates or in organic inputs related to autochthonous or allochthonous primary production.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4319/lo.1982.27.1.0137

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, M. B., & Ford, M. S. (.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Limnology and Oceanography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1982-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
137-150
ISSN
  • 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5590
OpenAlex
W2046371409
Cited by
226
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Limnology and Oceanography (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Geological formations and processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
sediment focusing, Mirror Lake, pollen analysis, radiocarbon dating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review