The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in freshwater and marine environments: A review of recent evidence on the effects of enrichment
Open accessAbstract
Phytoplankton can become limited by the availability of nutrients when light and temperature are adequate and loss rates are not excessive. The current paradigms for nutrient limitations in freshwater, estuarine, and marine environments are quite different. A review of the experimental and observational data used to infer P or N limitation of phytoplankton growth indicates that P limitation in freshwater environments can be demonstrated rigorously at several hierarchical levels of system complexity, from algal cultures to whole lakes. A similarly rigorous demonstration of N limitation has not been achieved for marine waters. Therefore, we conclude that the extent and severity of N limitation in the marine environment remain an open question. Culture studies have established that internal cellular concentrations of nutrients determine phytoplankton growth rates, and these studies have shown that it is often difficult to relate growth rates to external concentrations, especially in natural situations. This should lead to a greater reliance on the composition of particulate matter and biomass‐based physiological rates to infer nutrient limitation. Such measurements have demonstrated their utility in a wide variety of freshwater and marine environments, and, most importantly, they can be applied to systems that are difficult to manipulate experimentally or budget accurately. Dissolved nutrient concentrations are most useful in determining nutrient loading rates of aquatic ecosystems. The relative proportions of nutrients supplied to phytoplankton can be a strong selective force shaping phytoplankton communities and affecting the biomass yield per unit of limiting nutrient.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments
Hurlbert, S. H. (1984) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942661 · Cited by 8,377
Cited by
Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: nutrient sources, composition, and consequences
Anderson, D. M., Glibert, P. M., & Burkholder, J. M. (2002) · Estuaries · doi:10.1007/bf02804901 · Cited by 2,965
C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass?
Cleveland, C. C., & Liptzin, D. (2007) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-007-9132-0 · Cited by 2,365
The relative influences of nitrogen and phosphorus on oceanic primary production
Tyrrell, T. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/22941 · Cited by 1,687
Testing the iron hypothesis in ecosystems of the equatorial Pacific Ocean
Martin, J. H., Coale, K. H., Johnson, K. S., Fitzwater, S. E., Gordon, R. M., Tanner, S. J., Hunter, C. N., Elrod, V. A., Nowicki, J. L., Coley, T. L., et al. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/371123a0 · Cited by 1,382
Submerged aquatic vegetation in relation to different nutrient regimes
Duarte, C. M. (1995) · Ophelia · doi:10.1080/00785236.1995.10422039 · Cited by 924
Metadata
- Authors
- HECKY, R. E., & KILHAM, P.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4_part_2
- Pages
- 796-822
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137890357
- Cited by
- 1,447
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in freshwater and marine environments: A review of recent evidence on the effects of enrichment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1988.33.4_part_2.0796
- The paper
- HECKY, R. E., & KILHAM, P. (1988). Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in freshwater and marine environments: A review of recent evidence on the effects of enrichment. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1988.33.4_part_2.0796
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.