The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Production and use of detritus in various freshwater, estuarine, and coastal marine ecosystems
Abstract
In both freshwater and marine habitats, vascular marine plants arc little used by animals that graze directly on them, because they have a relatively high content of indigestible fiber and a low content of nitrogen. The chief emphasis of detritus research in the 1970s was to show how microorganisms progressively reduce the content of fiber and increase the content of nitrogren in vascular plant detritus, rendering it nutritious for animals. Algal (seaweed, diatom, etc.) detritus starts with a lower fiber content and a higher nitrogen content. Many animals can use it directly, and a very short period of microbial colonization renders it highly nutritious. As a result, a high proportion of the algal carbon originally produced passes into animals via detrital food webs, while a low proportion of vascular plant carbon does so. Much more of the latter simply supports microbial respiration. In the 1980s it was shown, particularly for freshwater habitats, that the dissolved organic matter (DOM) released by plants while living or in the early stages of decomposition readily precipitates on surfaces and forms amorphous particulate matter with a low content of refractory material. These particles are highly nutritious for animals and are used directly by freshwater fish such as Sarotherodon (= Tilapia), which is commercially important, especially in Africa and South America. It is suggested that the DOM pathway may be ecologically more significant than the POM (particulate organic matter) pathway and that processes analogous to those shown for lakes and rivers probably occur in estuarine and coastal waters. There is much circumstantial evidence to suggest that planktonic food webs based on DOM are much more important than previously thought. The conversion of DOM to POM through the “microbial loop” and its utilization in higher trophic levels is an urgent topic for further study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Best practice in Ecopath with Ecosim food-web models for ecosystem-based management
Heymans, J. J., Coll, M., Link, J. S., Mackinson, S., Steenbeek, J., Walters, C., & Christensen, V. (2016) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.12.007 · Cited by 529
Marine Fungi: Their Ecology and Molecular Diversity
Richards, T. A., Jones, M. D. M., Leonard, G., & Bass, D. (2012) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-120710-100802 · Cited by 478
ECOLOGICAL CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING CANDIDATE SITES FOR MARINE RESERVES
Roberts, C. M., Andelman, S., Branch, G., Bustamante, R. H., Carlos Castilla, J., Dugan, J., Halpern, B. S., Lafferty, K. D., Leslie, H., Lubchenco, J., et al. (2003) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0199:ecfecs]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- MANN, K. H.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4_part_2
- Pages
- 910-930
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2124270504
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Production and use of detritus in various freshwater, estuarine, and coastal marine ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1988.33.4_part_2.0910
- The paper
- MANN, K. H. (1988). Production and use of detritus in various freshwater, estuarine, and coastal marine ecosystems. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1988.33.4_part_2.0910
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.