Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Zooplankton effects on phytoplankton in lakes of contrasting trophic status

Open access
Elser, James J., Goldman, Charles R.·1991·Limnology and Oceanography

Abstract

Studies were carried out in three lakes of strongly contrasting trophic state to evaluate how the effects of zooplankton on phytoplankton vary as a function of lake productivity. Chlorophyll and total P concentrations differed by 2–3 orders of magnitude among ultra‐oligotrophic Lake Tahoe, meso‐oligotrophic Castle Lake, and strongly eutrophic Clear Lake. Three experimental designs involving short‐term (4 d) manipulations of nutrients, ambient zooplankton, and the common crustacean grazer Daphnia were performed in each lake. Algal responses were assessed at both the “aggregate,” community (Chl, primary productivity, nutrient status) and species levels. Experiments in Lake Tahoe revealed a high degree of nutrient sensitivity but negligible grazing impacts by the very low densities of ambient zooplankton. Daphnia grazing had substantial impacts on Tahoe phytoplankton, however, indicating high susceptibility to grazing in this assemblage of relatively small‐sized algal species. Castle Lake experiments revealed strong direct and indirect impacts of both ambient zooplankton and Daphnia on the nutrient‐limited algal assemblage. The cyanobacteria‐dominated algal community of Clear Lake was resistant to grazing impacts, responding relatively weakly only to the highest densities of Daphnia. Good correspondence between estimates of algal biomass made from chlorophyll measurements and microscopic examination were obtained, and, in Castle Lake, concordance between estimated community productivity turnover times made from species‐specific growth determinations and community productivity measurements was observed. The contrasting responses to experimental zooplankton manipulations in the three lakes provide support for the view that the coupling between zooplankton and phytoplankton is strongest in lakes of intermediate productivity and imply that food‐web alterations at the top of the food web are most likely to propagate to the level of the phytoplankton (and therefore lake water quality) in lakes of moderate trophic status.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4319/lo.1991.36.1.0064

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Elser, J. J., & Goldman, C. R.
Venue
Limnology and Oceanography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
64-90
ISSN
  • 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5590
OpenAlex
W2130456827
Cited by
221
References
1
FWCI
10.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Zooplankton effects on phytoplankton in lakes of contrasting trophic status. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1991.36.1.0064
The paper
Elser, J. J., & Goldman, C. R. (1991). Zooplankton effects on phytoplankton in lakes of contrasting trophic status. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1991.36.1.0064

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.