Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Oxygen and carbon dioxide mass balance for the estuarine‐intertidal marsh complex of five rivers in the southeastern U.S.

Open access
Cai, Wei‐Jun, Pomeroy, Lawrence R., Moran, Mary Ann, Wang, Yongchen·1999·Limnology and Oceanography

Abstract

We measured dissolved O 2 concentrations, p CO 2 values, and respiratory rates in five estuaries of the southeastern U.S. in October 1995 and July 1996. In the low‐salinity sections of the coastal plain rivers, dissolved O 2 saturation states were typically only 50%, while p CO 2 values were over 4,000 matm. Respiratory rates measured concurrently in estuarine water averaged 8 and 23 mmol m−3 d−1 in October 1995 and July 1996, but they showed little variability either within or among the five estuaries. Benthic chamber incubations in the adjacent intertidal marshes indicated fluxes of 30–40 mmol m−2 d−1 and 50–120 mmol m−2 d−1 for O 2 and total dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), respectively. For the Satilla River estuary, simple calculations revealed that neither respiratory activity in estuarine waters and sediments nor any other within‐estuary process (not including the intertidal marsh system) was sufficient to account for the observed O 2 concentrations and pCO 2 values. Dissolved oxygen concentrations in four other southeastern U.S. estuaries fit the same general pattern as the Satilla, and likewise, within‐estuary processes could not explain observed gas concentrations. Measured O 2 concentrations, p CO 2 values, pelagic respiratory rates, and benthic fluxes were used to construct a mass‐balance model, focusing on the influence of the extensive intertidal marshes on O 2 and CO 2 mass balance and water‐atmosphere gas exchange in the five estuaries. Results indicate that respiratory activity in the sediments and overlying water of the marshes during high tide leaves a signal that is funneled back to the estuary during ebb tide and can account for the estuarine gas concentrations and fluxes. Both experimental and modeling approaches argue that the intertidal marshes of the southeastern U.S. export considerable amounts of inorganic respiratory products to the estuaries and that “outwelling” of organic matter to the estuaries is a minor process by comparison. The DIC exported to the coastal ocean, however, is only a small fraction of the total gas mass flow between the marsh, estuary, and atmosphere.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4319/lo.1999.44.3.0639

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Metadata

Authors
Cai, W., Pomeroy, L. R., Moran, M. A., & Wang, Y.
Venue
Limnology and Oceanography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-05
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
639-649
ISSN
  • 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5590
OpenAlex
W2129407763
Cited by
159
References
2
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oxygen and carbon dioxide mass balance for the estuarine‐intertidal marsh complex of five rivers in the southeastern U.S. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1999.44.3.0639
The paper
Cai, W., Pomeroy, L. R., Moran, M. A., & Wang, Y. (1999). Oxygen and carbon dioxide mass balance for the estuarine‐intertidal marsh complex of five rivers in the southeastern U.S. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1999.44.3.0639

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.