The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Autochthonous versus allochthonous carbon sources of bacteria: Results from whole‐lake 13C addition experiments
Open accessAbstract
Organic substrates for pelagic bacteria are derived from dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in the water column. DOC is a heterogeneous mixture of molecules, some of which are imported from the watershed (allochthonous DOC) and others that are produced by autotrophs within the system (autochthonous DOC). We examined the importance of autochthonous versus allochthonous DOC in supporting the growth of pelagic bacteria by manipulating the 13 C content of autochthonous sources in a whole‐lake experiment. NaH 13 CO 3 was added daily to two small forested lakes for a period of 42 d, thereby strongly labeling autochthonous primary production. To obtain bacterial carbon isotopes, bacteria were regrown in vitro in particle‐free lake water and in situ in dialysis tubes; little difference was found between the two methods. The contribution of autochthonous versus allochthonous carbon to the bacterial biomass was estimated by applying a two‐member mixing model using a 13 C of −28‰ as the allochthonous end member. The autochthonous end member, which varied over time, was estimated indirectly by several approaches. The bacterial biomass consisted of 35–70% allochthonous carbon. This result confirms the often‐stated hypothesis that autochthonous carbon alone does not support bacterial production. On the other hand, autochthonous DOC was preferentially utilized relative to terrestrial DOC. On the basis of 13 C measurements, only 13% of the DOC standing stock was of recent autochthonous origin, but it supported 30–65% of bacterial production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sagan, V., Peterson, K. T., Maimaitijiang, M., Sidike, P., Sloan, J., Greeling, B. A., Maalouf, S., & Adams, C. (2020) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103187 · Cited by 649
Marcarelli, A. M., Baxter, C. V., Mineau, M. M., & Hall, R. O. (2011) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/10-2240.1 · Cited by 490
Carpenter, S. R., Cole, J. J., Pace, M. L., Van de Bogert, M., Bade, D. L., Bastviken, D., Gille, C. M., Hodgson, J. R., Kitchell, J. F., & Kritzberg, E. S. (2005) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/04-1282 · Cited by 391
Self-citationDifferential support of lake food webs by three types of terrestrial organic carbon
Cole, J. J., Carpenter, S. R., Pace, M. L., Van de Bogert, M. C., Kitchell, J. L., & Hodgson, J. R. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00898.x · Cited by 369
Self-citationALGAE AS COMPETITORS FOR GLUCOSE WITH HETEROTROPHIC BACTERIA 1
Kamjunke, N., Köhler, B., Wannicke, N., & Tittel, J. (2008) · Journal of Phycology · doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.2008.00520.x · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Kritzberg, E. S., Cole, J. J., Pace, M. L., Granéli, W., & Bade, D. L.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 588-596
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W2104166468
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autochthonous versus allochthonous carbon sources of bacteria: Results from whole‐lake 13C addition experiments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.2004.49.2.0588
- The paper
- Kritzberg, E. S., Cole, J. J., Pace, M. L., Granéli, W., & Bade, D. L. (2004). Autochthonous versus allochthonous carbon sources of bacteria: Results from whole‐lake 13C addition experiments. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2004.49.2.0588
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.