The DOI matches its Crossref record; 118 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Monitoring inland water quality using remote sensing: potential and limitations of spectral indices, bio-optical simulations, machine learning, and cloud computing
Open accessAbstract
Given the recent advances in remote sensing analytics, cloud computing, and machine learning, it is imperative to evaluate capabilities of remote sensing for water quality monitoring in the context of water resources management and decision-making. The objectives of this review were to analyze recent advances in water quality remote sensing and determine limitations of current systems, estimation methods, and suggest future improvements. To that end, we collected over 200 sets of water quality data including blue-green algae phycocyanin (BGA-PC), chlorophyll-a (Chl-a), dissolved oxygen (DO), specific conductivity (SC), fluorescent dissolved organic matter (fDOM), turbidity, and pollution-sediments from 2016 to 2018. The water quality data, generated from laboratory analysis of grab samples and in-situ real-time monitoring sensors distributed in eight lakes and rivers in Midwestern United States, were paired with synchronous proximal spectra, tripod-mounted hyperspectral imagery, and satellite data. The results showed that both proximal and satellite-based sensors have great potential to provide accurate estimate of optically active parameters, and remote sensing of non-optically active parameters may be indirectly estimated but still remains a challenge. Data-driven empirical approaches, i.e., deep learning outperformed the other competing methods, providing promising possibility for operational use of remote sensing in water quality monitoring and decision-making. As the first-time review of deep neural networks for water quality estimation, the paper concludes that anomaly detection utilizing multi-sensor data fusion and virtual constellation in cloud-computing is the most promising means for predicting impending water pollution outbreaks such as algal blooms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562
Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures.
Savitzky, A., & Golay, M. J. E. (1964) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60214a047 · Cited by 21,904
(2005) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2005.s303 · Cited by 17,923
(2012) · Cited by 9,062
Hahn, G. J., Draper, N., & Smith, H. (1982) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1267833 · Cited by 5,773
Organic Geochemistry of Natural Waters
Thurman, E. M. (1985) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-5095-5 · Cited by 3,091
Helms, J. R., Stubbins, A., Ritchie, J. D., Minor, E. C., Kieber, D. J., & Mopper, K. (2008) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.2008.53.3.0955 · Cited by 2,958
Schindler, D. W. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.195.4275.260 · Cited by 2,623
Cited by
A Review of Remote Sensing for Water Quality Retrieval: Progress and Challenges
Yang, H., Kong, J., Hu, H., Du, Y., Gao, M., & Chen, F. (2022) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs14081770 · Cited by 396
Machine learning in natural and engineered water systems
Huang, R., Ma, C., Ma, J., Huangfu, X., & He, Q. (2021) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2021.117666 · Cited by 319
Adjovu, G. E., Stephen, H., James, D., & Ahmad, S. (2023) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs15143534 · Cited by 292
A meta-analysis on harmful algal bloom (HAB) detection and monitoring: a remote sensing perspective
Khan, R. M., Salehi, B., Mahdianpari, M., Mohammadimanesh, F., Mountrakis, G., & Quackenbush, L. J. (2021) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs13214347 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Sagan, V., Peterson, K. T., Maimaitijiang, M., Sidike, P., Sloan, J., Greeling, B. A., Maalouf, S., & Adams, C.
- Venue
- Earth-Science Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 205
- Pages
- 103187
- ISSN
- 0012-8252 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3018952706
- Cited by
- 649
- References
- 118
- FWCI
- 18.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monitoring inland water quality using remote sensing: potential and limitations of spectral indices, bio-optical simulations, machine learning, and cloud computing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103187
- The paper
- Sagan, V., Peterson, K. T., Maimaitijiang, M., Sidike, P., Sloan, J., Greeling, B. A., Maalouf, S., & Adams, C. (2020). Monitoring inland water quality using remote sensing: potential and limitations of spectral indices, bio-optical simulations, machine learning, and cloud computing. Earth-Science Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103187
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.