The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Freshwater input structures soil properties, vertical accretion, and nutrient accumulation of Georgia and U.S tidal marshes
Open accessAbstract
To identify relationships between freshwater input and marsh soil properties, measurements of bulk density, nutrients (carbon [C], nitrogen [N], phosphorus [P]), accretion, and accumulation were compared in tidal marshes of three estuaries of Georgia that varied in delivery of freshwater. Soil organic C and N (0–30 cm) were two times greater in marshes of the freshwater‐dominated Altamaha River than in the salt marshes of Doboy Sound and Sapelo River. 137 Cs accretion and accumulation of organic C and N were three to five times greater in freshwaterdominated marshes than in salt marshes. The patterns observed in Georgia marshes were geographically general; data for tidal freshwater and brackish marsh soils compiled from 61 studies in the conterminous United States showed lower bulk density and higher percent organic C and N than salt marshes, regardless of geographic region. Salinity, a proxy for freshwater input, was inversely correlated with percent soil organic C and N and with vertical accretion in Georgia marshes and in marshes elsewhere in the conterminous United States. There was no relationship between above‐ or belowground emergent plant production and salinity of Georgia marshes but the rate of root decomposition was positively related to salinity, and decomposition rate was negatively related to percent soil organic C and C accumulation. In Georgia tidal marshes and elsewhere, soil organic matter content and accumulation are mediated by freshwater through its effects on decomposition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mcleod, E., Chmura, G. L., Bouillon, S., Salm, R., Björk, M., Duarte, C. M., Lovelock, C. E., Schlesinger, W. H., & Silliman, B. R. (2011) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/110004 · Cited by 3,590
Forecasting the effects of accelerated sea‐level rise on tidal marsh ecosystem services
Craft, C., Clough, J., Ehman, J., Joye, S., Park, R., Pennings, S., Guo, H., & Machmuller, M. (2009) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/070219 · Cited by 773
Self-citationWetland soil microplastics are negatively related to vegetation cover and stem density
Helcoski, R., Yonkos, L. T., Sanchez, A., & Baldwin, A. H. (2020) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113391 · Cited by 281
Biogeochemical implications of climate change for tropical rivers and floodplains
Hamilton, S. K. (2010) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/s10750-009-0086-1 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Craft, C.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1220-1230
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W2150587558
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Freshwater input structures soil properties, vertical accretion, and nutrient accumulation of Georgia and U.S tidal marshes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.2007.52.3.1220
- The paper
- Craft, C. (2007). Freshwater input structures soil properties, vertical accretion, and nutrient accumulation of Georgia and U.S tidal marshes. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2007.52.3.1220
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.