The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optimization of DNA extraction for quantitative marine bacterioplankton community analysis
Abstract
The coupling between the presence of predominant bacterial species and particular biogeochemical processes is of primary interest in current microbial ecology. Molecular methods such as microarrays and real‐time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) may be used to estimate presence or expression of different genes (e.g., 16S rDNA and nifH) in environmental samples; however, to be quantitative, these methods require a reproducible and efficient DNA extraction protocol. Using picogreen DNA quantification, real‐time PCR, and an internal DNA standard, we step‐wise examined and optimized a protocol for DNA extraction from centrifuged or filtered seawater samples (vol. 2 to 300 mL). Sample volume had a pronounced effect on DNA extraction efficiency showing that comparison of samples with different volumes is problematic. The duration of enzyme treatment (lysozyme and proteinase K) significantly influenced the DNA extraction efficiency. Dissolved DNA contributed significantly to total DNA when extracted from small filtering volumes (<10 mL). Addition of a coprecipitant (yeast tRNA) improved the precipitation of low‐concentration DNA from 13% to 89%. When tested on various seawater samples, as well as on isolates, the optimized extraction protocol was found to be highly reproducible with an average extraction efficiency for seawater samples of 92% and for isolates of 96%. The quantitative outcome and the high extraction efficiency of the presented extraction protocol will be of value to future studies based on DNA extracted from seawater samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global patterns of diversity and community structure in marine bacterioplankton
POMMIER, T., CANBÄCK, B., RIEMANN, L., BOSTRÖM, K. H., SIMU, K., LUNDBERG, P., TUNLID, A., & HAGSTRÖM, Å. (2007) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.03189.x · Cited by 466
Self-citationStegen, J. C., Fredrickson, J. K., Wilkins, M. J., Konopka, A. E., Nelson, W. C., Arntzen, E. V., Chrisler, W. B., Chu, R. K., Danczak, R. E., Fansler, S. J., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11237 · Cited by 409
Probiotics in aquaculture of China — Current state, problems and prospect
Qi, Z., Zhang, X.-H., Boon, N., & Bossier, P. (2009) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.02.012 · Cited by 320
Global distribution and diversity of marine Verrucomicrobia
Freitas, S., Hatosy, S., Fuhrman, J. A., Huse, S. M., Mark Welch, D. B., Sogin, M. L., & Martiny, A. C. (2012) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2012.3 · Cited by 236
Metadata
- Authors
- Boström, K. H., Simu, K., Hagström, Å., & Riemann, L.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 365-373
- ISSN
- 1541-5856 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988072320
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimization of DNA extraction for quantitative marine bacterioplankton community analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lom.2004.2.365
- The paper
- Boström, K. H., Simu, K., Hagström, Å., & Riemann, L. (2004). Optimization of DNA extraction for quantitative marine bacterioplankton community analysis. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods. https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2004.2.365
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.