The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Asking the Right Questions about Teacher Preparation: Contributions of research on teacher thinking
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Teachers' beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct
Pajares, M. F. (1992) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543062003307 · Cited by 9,007
Co‐constructing inquiry‐based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform
Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.1023 · Cited by 555
Gore, J. M., & Zeichner, K. M. (1991) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/0742-051x(91)90022-h · Cited by 428
A History and Context of Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices
Loughran, J. J. (2004) · International Handbook of Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6545-3_1 · Cited by 372
Chapter 2: To Use Their Minds Well: Investigating New Forms of Student Assessment
Wolf, D., Bixby, J., Glenn, J., & Gardner, H. (1991) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x017001031 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Venue
- Teacher Thinking & Professional Action
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2005-10-09
- Pages
- 193-204
- OpenAlex
- W4247746232
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 53.70
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Asking the Right Questions about Teacher Preparation: Contributions of research on teacher thinking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203012505-26
- The paper
- Asking the Right Questions about Teacher Preparation: Contributions of research on teacher thinking. (2005). Teacher Thinking & Professional Action. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203012505-26
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
