Party Policy in Modern Democracies
Open accessAbstract
A new and wide-ranging empirical overview of party policy in 47 modern democracies, including all of the new democracies of Eastern Europe. It updates and radically extends Policy and Party Competition (1992), which established itself as a key mainstream data source for all political scientists exploring the policy positions of political parties. This essential text is divided into three clear parts: Part I introduces the study, themes and methodology Part II deals in depth with the wide range of issues involved in estimating and analyzing the policy positions of key political actors. Part III is the key data section that identifies key policy dimensions across the 47 countries, detailing their party positions and median legislators, and is complemented by graphical representations of each party system. This book is an invaluable reference for all political scientists, particularly those interested in party policy and comparative politics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In most European countries, the policy space is usually conceived as two-dimensional.
“But that is not the case in most European countries, where the policy space is usually conceived as two-dimensional (see, e.g., Benoit and Laver 2006).”
From Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data (2015) · cites this paper as Benoit and Laver 2006
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data
Barberá, P. (2015) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpu011 · Cited by 982 · see citing works
A Scaling Model for Estimating Time‐Series Party Positions from Texts
Slapin, J. B., & Proksch, S. (2008) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00338.x · Cited by 684 · see citing works
Are Cultural and Economic Conservatism Positively Correlated? A Large-Scale Cross-National Test
Malka, A., Lelkes, Y., & Soto, C. J. (2019) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123417000072 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Bain, P., Bianchi, G., Caprara, M. G., Cieciuch, J., Kirmanoglu, H., Baslevent, C., Lönnqvist, J.-E., et al. (2014) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9255-z · Cited by 239 · see citing works
- Authors
- Benoit, K., & Laver, M.
- Affiliations
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
- New York University (US)
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2006-10-16
- OpenAlex
- W2074589553
- Cited by
- 1,616
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 132 · 2018: 86 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 103 · 2014: 108 · 2013: 131 · 2012: 127
- FWCI
- 104.88
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Keywords
- party positions, political parties, party system, policy dimensions, new democracies, Eastern Europe, comparative politics, party competition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review