The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Infoglut: How Too Much Information Is Changing the Way We Think and Know
Abstract
Today, more mediated information is available to more people than at any other time in human history. New and revitalized sense-making strategies multiply in response to the challenges of "cutting through the clutter" of competing narratives and taming the avalanche of information. Data miners, "sentiment analysts," and decision markets offer to help bodies of data "speak for themselves"—making sense of their own patterns so we don’t have to. Neuromarketers and body language experts promise to peer behind people’s words to see what their brains are really thinking and feeling. New forms of information processing promise to displace the need for expertise and even comprehension—at least for those with access to the data. Infoglut explores the connections between these wide-ranging sense-making strategies for an era of information overload and "big data," and the new forms of control they enable. Andrejevic critiques the popular embrace of deconstructive debunkery, calling into question the post-truth, post-narrative, and post-comprehension politics it underwrites, and tracing a way beyond them.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As less human agency is incorporated in their building, these categories lack explainability (Bolin and Andersson Schwarz, 2015); they have been coined”
From How online advertising targets consumers: The uses of categories and algorithmic tools by audience planners (2024) · cites this paper as Andrejevic, 2013
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–509 of 509
Platform Society: Towards a Genesis History
Мельничук, Д. В., & Суслов, И. В. (2026) · Research Result Social Studies and Humanities · doi:10.18413/2408-932x-2026-12-3-1-0
Communication in the Algorithmic City, by Joshua Cohen
Lazar, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197787977.003.0007
Just Governance and the Right to the Algorithmic City, by Renée Jorgensen
Lazar, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197787977.003.0005
Comment on ‘The Algorithmic City’, by Arvind Narayanan
Lazar, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197787977.003.0008
Lazar, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197787977.002.0006
Introduction: Artificial Intelligence and Platform Capitalism
Lazar, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197787977.003.0001
Reply to Jorgensen, Fourcade, Cohen, and Narayanan
Lazar, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197787977.003.0009
Lazar, S. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197787977.001.0001
Divided by Code: Pre-emption and Constitution in the ‘Algorithmic City’, by Marion Fourcade
Lazar, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197787977.003.0006
Metadata
- Authors
- Andrejevic, M.
- Corresponding author
- Andrejevic, Mark
- ORCID
- Andrejevic, Mark
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2013-06-26
- OpenAlex
- W4240960057
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 23.16
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Cultural Studies and Postmodernism
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Communication › Digital Media and Philosophy
- Keywords
- information overload, big data, sensemaking, data mining, sentiment analysis, neuromarketing, body language, post-truth, control, datafication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review