The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Educational Design Research
Abstract
Educational design research is the systematic study of designing, developing and evaluating educational programs, processes and products. It can be an invaluable process, yielding considerable insight into how to optimize educational interventions and better understand teaching and learning. However, the fact that such investigations are typically carried out in naturalistic settings - with all the color and complexity that accompanies real classrooms and schools - presents researchers with significant methodological challenges, and scientific rigor can be difficult to maintain. This book addresses a clear and growing need to better understand and address the challenges faced by educational design researchers. "Educational Design Research" has been written to appeal to the rapidly growing international audience of educational researchers who situate their studies in practice. The publication contains four main parts, plus supplementary materials available on a companion website. First, a mixture of substantive information is presented for those interested in learning about the essence of design research. The second part of the book features examples of design research, and in the third, researchers share their views on quality assurance. Finally, policy implications are offered and discussed, with particular attention paid to understanding and evaluating design research work. The chapters of this volume are revised, updated and expanded versions of presentations and dialogue shared at a seminar sponsored by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). The intentions were to clarify exactly what design research entails, to articulate quality standards and reach anunderstanding of how to judge research proposals and products. Leading scholars form Europe and North America were invited to share their views on design research and advance understanding of how academic standards should be guarded when using this approach. Altogether, this book provides an informative and instructive platform for considering the domain of design research in education. Anyone with an interest in educational research will find it essential reading.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2010) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1080/01411920902919257 · Cited by 511
Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment
Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J., & Brown, C. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.819566 · Cited by 390
Use of the ARCS model in education: A literature review
Li, K., & Keller, J. M. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.019 · Cited by 292
Under which conditions does ICT have a positive effect on teaching and learning? A Call to Action
Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Cox, M., Knezek, D., & ten Brummelhuis, A. (2013) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00453.x · Cited by 246
Implementation of inquiry-based learning in day-to-day teaching: a synthesis
Maaß, K., & Artigue, M. (2013) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0528-0 · Cited by 216
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2006-11-22
- OpenAlex
- W4241298877
- Cited by
- 1,198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.83
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Educational Design Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203088364
- The paper
- Educational Design Research. (2006). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203088364
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.