Cited by 102Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesDisability Education and EmploymentDisability Rights and Representation

E-learning and Disability in Higher Education

Seale, Jane·2013·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

Most people working within the higher education sector understand the importance of making e-learning accessible to students with disabilities, yet it is not always clear exactly how this should be accomplished. E-Learning and Disability in Higher Education evaluates current accessibility practice and critiques the extent to which 'best' practices can be confidently identified and disseminated. This second edition has been fully updated and includes a focus on research that seeks to give 'voice' to disabled students in a way that provides an indispensible insight into their relationship with technologies and the institutions in which they study. Examining the social, educational, and political background behind making online learning accessible in higher and further education, E-Learning and Disability in Higher Education considers the roles and perspectives of the key stake-holders involved in e-learning: lecturers, professors, instructional designers, learning technologists, student support services, staff developers, and senior managers and administrators.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203095942

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seale, J.
Affiliations
University of Plymouth (GB)
Corresponding author
Seale, Jane
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2013-10-08
OpenAlex
W4251571440
Cited by
102
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.79
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
Keywords
e-learning accessibility, disability, higher education, online learning, students with disabilities, accessibility best practices, stakeholder perspectives, student support services, further education, inclusive education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review