Verbal Hygiene
Abstract
In Verbal Hygiene, Deborah Cameron takes a serious look at popular attitudes towards language and examines the practices by which people attempt to regulate its use. Instead of dismissing the practice of ‘verbal hygiene’, as a misguided and pernicious exercise, she argues that popular discourse about language values – good and bad, right and wrong – serves an important function for those engaged in it. A series of case studies deal with specific examples of verbal hygiene: the regulation of ‘style’ by editors, the teaching of English grammar in schools, the movements for and against so-called ‘politically correct’ language and the advice given to women on how they can speak more effectively. This Routledge Linguistics Classic includes a new foreword which looks at how the issues covered in the case studies have developed over time and a new afterword which discusses new concerns which have emerged in the last 15 years, from the regimentation of language in the workplace to panics about immigration and terrorism, which are expressed in linguistic terms. Addressed to linguists, to professional language-users of all kinds, and to anyone interested in language and culture, Verbal Hygiene calls for legitimate concerns about language and value to be discussed, by experts and lay-speakers alike, in a rational and critical spirit.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The successful foray of inclusive language policies into linguistically diverse institutions bears witness to the mainstreaming of gender and sexuality.
“The successful foray of inclusive language policies into linguistically diverse institutions bears witness to this mainstreaming”
From Relocating power: the feminist potency of language, gender and sexuality research (2021) · cites this paper as Cameron 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Relocating power: the feminist potency of language, gender and sexuality research
Hall, K., Borba, R., & Hiramoto, M. (2021) · Gender and Language · doi:10.1558/genl.19523 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cameron, D.
- Corresponding author
- Cameron, Deborah
- ORCID
- Cameron, Deborah
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2012-03-15
- OpenAlex
- W4234337799
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 11.26
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistic research and analysis
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
- Keywords
- verbal hygiene, language attitudes, linguistic values, language regulation, English grammar teaching, political correctness, women's speech, workplace language, language and culture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review