The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving school effectiveness
Open accessAbstract
The longitudinal evaluation of self evaluation and external review which began formally in 2001 has now been extended to 2014. The second paper in this volume, written in 2006, compares the Hong Kong experience with the New Relationship with Schools in England.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Cohen, J. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203771587 · Cited by 25,373
Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains
De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543068002179 · Cited by 1,593
Cited by
Professional Learning Communities: A Review of the Literature
Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006) · Journal of Educational Change · doi:10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8 · Cited by 2,570
Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307310317 · Cited by 1,259
The Impact of Educational Research on Mathematics Education
Wiliam, D. (2003) · Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0273-8_16 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Venue
- Learning In and Out of School
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2011-12-14
- Pages
- 20-20
- OpenAlex
- W1889179633
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 159.24
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving school effectiveness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203154618-8
- The paper
- Improving school effectiveness. (2011). Learning In and Out of School. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203154618-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
