The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Selective Attention in Vision
Abstract
Clarifies the complex concept of selective attention - how the brain is able to select information form the vast amount available to it - and provides a clear and explicit theory of central importance to psychologists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Foxe, J. J., & Snyder, A. C. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00154 · Cited by 1,558
Worden, M. S., Foxe, J. J., Wang, N., & Simpson, G. V. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-06-j0002.2000 · Cited by 1,268
An instance theory of attention and memory.
Logan, G. D. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.2.376 · Cited by 467
Talsma, D., Doty, T. J., & Woldorff, M. G. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhk016 · Cited by 434
Cognitive control of saccadic eye movements.
Hutton, S. B. (2008) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2008.08.021 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Heijden, A. H. C.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2003-09-02
- OpenAlex
- W1495812926
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.66
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selective Attention in Vision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203359341
- The paper
- van der Heijden, A. H. C. (2003). Selective Attention in Vision. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203359341
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
