The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Buddhist Unconscious
Abstract
This is the story of fifth century CE India, when the Yogacarin Buddhists tested the awareness of unawareness, and became aware of human unawareness to an extraordinary degree. They not only explicitly differentiated this dimension of mental processes from conscious cognitive processes, but also offered reasoned arguments on behalf of this dimension of mind. This is the concept of the 'Buddhist unconscious', which arose just as philosophical discourse in other circles was fiercely debating the limits of conscious awareness, and these ideas in turn had developed as a systematisation of teachings from the Buddha himself. For us in the twenty-first century, these teachings connect in fascinating ways to the Western conceptions of the 'cognitive unconscious' which have been elaborated in the work of Jung and Freud. This important study reveals how the Buddhist unconscious illuminates and draws out aspects of current western thinking on the unconscious mind. One of the most intriguing connections is the idea that there is in fact no substantial 'self' underlying all mental activity; 'the thoughts themselves are the thinker'. William S. Waldron considers the implications of this radical notion, which, despite only recently gaining plausibility, was in fact first posited 2,500 years ago.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the 'classical' Yoga ¯ca ¯ra tradition associated with Asan ˙ga and Vasubandhu enumerates five, namely: contact ( spar ś a , chu 觸 ), attention ( manask ā ra , zuoyi 作 意 ), feeling or sensation ( vedan ā , shou 受 ), conception ( sa ṃ jñ ā , xiang 想 ), and volition ( cetan ā , si 思 ).”
From Is Yogācāra Phenomenology? Some Evidence from the Cheng weishi lun (2016) · cites this paper as Waldron (2003, p. 223 n. 48)
In the citing paper
“This is made explicit in the Yog ā c ā rabh ū miśā stra , which acknowledges that, as features of the ā layavijñ ā na , the omnipresent factors occur 'beneath the threshold of conscious awareness ( s ū k ṣ maprav ṛ tti ), imperceptible 'even for the wise.''”
From Is Yogācāra Phenomenology? Some Evidence from the Cheng weishi lun (2016) · cites this paper as Waldron (2003, p. 111)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Is Yogācāra Phenomenology? Some Evidence from the Cheng weishi lun
Sharf, R. H. (2016) · Journal of Indian Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10781-015-9282-7 · Cited by 18
Prueitt, C. (2018) · Sophia · doi:10.1007/s11841-017-0618-5 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Waldron, W. S.
- Corresponding author
- Waldron, William S
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2003-12-08
- OpenAlex
- W4231161719
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 4.80
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Keywords
- Yogācāra, unawareness, cognitive unconscious, Jung, Sigmund Freud, altruism, no-self, Indian Buddhist philosophy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review