The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Everyday Life and Cultural Theory
Abstract
Everyday Life and Cultural Theory provides a unique critical and historical introduction to theories of everyday life. Ben Highmore traces the development of conceptions of everyday life, from the cultural sociology of Georg Simmel, through the Mass-Observation project of the 1930s to contemporary theorists such as Michel de Certeau.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Other files come from the archives of Mass-Observation, a social research organisation which was commissioned by the Ministry of Information between 1939 and 1941 to provide information on civilian morale and, most pertinently, on the public's reception of the Ministry's propaganda (Highmore, 2002; Hinton, 2013).”
From The Ministry of Information and the linguistic design of Britain’s World War II propaganda: What archival documents can tell us about political discourse (2020) · cites this paper as Highmore, 2002
Citations
Cited by
Blackman, L., Cromby, J., Hook, D., Papadopoulos, D., & Walkerdine, V. (2008) · Subjectivity · doi:10.1057/sub.2008.8 · Cited by 289
Chen, Z. T. (2021) · Journal of Consumer Culture · doi:10.1177/1469540518787574 · Cited by 121
Bruce Lee: A visual poetics of postwar Japanese manliness
MACKINTOSH, J. D. (2014) · Modern Asian Studies · doi:10.1017/s0026749x13000437 · Cited by 5
Spencer-Bennett, J. (2020) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926519889125 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Highmore, B.
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2002-08-27
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
