The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Political Economy of Corruption
Abstract
This essay explores the nature, causes, and consequences of corruption as it pertains to entire regimes. Grand corruption is modeled as a type of unproductive rent-seeking at the highest levels of government. The economic costs of corruption are assumed to increase in the decentralization (and relaxation) of its governance, increase convexly in the percentage extracted, and decreasing in the opportunities for productive rent-seeking. Combining these assumptions with the benefits of corruption yields the results that optimal corruption revenues are increasing in greed of the regime and in economic opportunities but that the economic costs of corruption may be highest in the least avaricious regime. The theory is illustrated with a stylized account of corruption in three Philippine administrations, from 1973-1998. Policy implications are discussed, including the role of the economist in making corruption less attractive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Greasing the wheels? The impact of regulations and corruption on firm entry
Dreher, A., & Gassebner, M. (2013) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/s11127-011-9871-2 · Cited by 746
The importance of faith: Tax morale and religiosity
Torgler, B. (2006) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2004.10.007 · Cited by 506
Syndromes of corruption: wealth, power, and democracy
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-1760 · Cited by 447
Government Spending, Corruption and Economic Growth
d’Agostino, G., Dunne, J. P., & Pieroni, L. (2016) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.03.011 · Cited by 373
The institutional economics of corruption and reform: theory, evidence, and policy
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-0389 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2001-06-07
- OpenAlex
- W639546590
- Cited by
- 563
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.83
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Political Economy of Corruption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203468388
- The paper
- The Political Economy of Corruption. (2001). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203468388
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.