The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Designing interactions
Abstract
Traditionally information systems are designed around an idealized model of the task that needs to be accomplished, and failure in system performance is explained away by blaming human social and cultural ‘barriers’ to technology adoption. In this world, the barrier of human frailty always impedes the newly engineered system. The design of the computational machinery is the scientific high ground, and understanding the mess of implementation in the real world is left to ‘soft’ social science and happenstance. But people are part of the system. The web of interactions needed to make anything work in a complex organization always involves humans solving problems with limited resources and working around imperfect processes. Designing the technological tools that humans will use, independent of the way that the tools will impact the organization, only optimizes local task-specific solutions, and ignores global realities. The biggest information repository in most organizations sits within the heads of those who work there, and the largest communication network is the web of conversations that binds them. Together, people, tools and conversations-that is the ‘system’. Consequently, the design of information and communication systems must also include the people who will use them. We must therefore design interactions that reflect the machinery of human thought and communication, sometimes mediated by communication channels, sometimes in partnership with computational agents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysing potential harm in Australian general practice: an incident‐monitoring study
Bhasale, A. L., Miller, G. C., Reid, S. E., & Britt, H. C. (1998) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb140186.x · Cited by 230
Cited by
Co-creation and the new landscapes of design
Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008) · CoDesign · doi:10.1080/15710880701875068 · Cited by 5,561
Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action
Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. (2008) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2008.08.001 · Cited by 594
(2008) · International journal of design · Cited by 582
Evaluating Information Visualizations
Carpendale, S. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70956-5_2 · Cited by 364
Zallio, M., & Clarkson, P. J. (2022) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2022.101909 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Venue
- Health Information Management
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2003-12-04
- Pages
- 111-132
- OpenAlex
- W2338314300
- Cited by
- 608
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.07
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Designing interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203563298-15
- The paper
- Designing interactions. (2003). Health Information Management. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203563298-15
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.