Cited by 594Information Systems Theories and ImplementationManagement and Organizational StudiesInnovation and Knowledge Management

Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action

Pentland, Brian T., Feldman, Martha S.·2008·Information and Organization

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2008.08.001

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Newly developed solutions do not automatically lead to changes in the organizational patterns of action.

    “research shows that newly developed solutions-regardless of how carefully they are designed-do not automatically lead to changes in the organizational patterns of action (Feldman 2003;Howard-Grenville 2005;Pentland and Feldman 2008).”

    From Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization (2020) · cites this paper as Pentland and Feldman 2008

  • Altering open source project governance practices while hoping for routine patterns of action is an approach potentially wrought with setbacks.

    “we root our research in the premise that altering open source project governance practices while hoping for routine patterns of action is an approach potentially wrought with setbacks (Pentland and Feldman 2008;Shaikh and Henfridsson 2017)”
  • Viewing open source licences only as ostensive objects obscures the negotiated and dynamic activities by which they are created, changed, and how people react to these changes.

    “Viewing open source licences only as ostensive objects obscures the negotiated and dynamic activities by which they are created, changed, and how people react to these changes (Wenger 1998;Feldman and Pentland 2003;Pentland and Feldman 2008;Arazy et al. 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Pentland, Brian T.
Venue
Information and Organization
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-10
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
235-250
ISSN
1471-7727 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109638841
Cited by
594
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 35
FWCI
50.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Information and Organization (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
organizational routines, routine design, technological determinism, narrative networks, generative systems, non-human actors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review