CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 175Innovative Education and Learning PracticesLiteracy, Media, and EducationLinguistics and Education Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Situated Language and Learning: A Critique of Traditional Schooling

Gee, James Paul·2012·Routledge eBooks
DOI 10.4324/9780203594216
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Why do poor and minority students under-perform in school? Do computer games help or hinder learning? What can new research in psychology teach our educational policy-makers?In this major new book, Gee tackles the 'big ideas' about language, literacy and learning, putting forward an integrated theory that crosses disciplinary boundaries, and applying it to some of the very real problems that face educationalists today.Situated Language and Learning looks at the specialist academic varieties of language that are used in disciplines such as mathematics and the sciences. It argues that the language acquisition process needed to learn these forms of language is not given enough attention by schools, and that this places unfair demands on poor and minority students.The book compares this with learning as a process outside the classroom, applying this idea to computer and video games, and exploring the particular processes of learning which take place as a child interacts with others and technology to learn and play. In doing so, Gee examines what video games can teach us about how to improve learning in schools and engages with current debates on subjects such as 'communities of practice' and 'digital literacies'.Bringing together the latest research from a number of disciplines, Situated Language and Learning is a bold and controversial book by a leading figure in the field, and is essential reading for anyone interested in education and language.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203594216

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–175 of 175

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gee, J. P.
Corresponding author
Gee, James Paul
ORCID
Gee, James Paul
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2012-10-02
DOI
10.4324/9780203594216
OpenAlex
W4251157997
Cited by
174
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.23
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy, Media, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Linguistics and Education Research
Keywords
disciplinary language, language acquisition, literacy, educational inequality, disadvantaged students, minority students, video games, out-of-school learning, communities of practice, digital literacy, educational psychology, education policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review