The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fee, D., & Fairclough, N. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074659 · Cited by 11,611
Self-citationConnerton, P. (1989) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511628061 · Cited by 6,086
Cited by
Xu, L., Sanders, L., Li, K., & Chow, J. C. L. (2021) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/27850 · Cited by 571
Carlson, M. (2015) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2014.976412 · Cited by 542
Drinking male tears: language, the manosphere, and networked harassment
Marwick, A. E., & Caplan, R. (2018) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2018.1450568 · Cited by 495
The language of critical discourse analysis: the case of nominalization
Billig, M. (2008) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926508095894 · Cited by 386
Tsoukas, H. (2017) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12219 · Cited by 368
Metadata
- Authors
- Fairclough, N.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2003-04-24
- OpenAlex
- W4248308225
- Cited by
- 6,063
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 241.39
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203697078
- The paper
- Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
