The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Law and Asylum: Space, Subject, Resistance
Abstract
In contrast to the claim that refugee law has been a key in guaranteeing a space of protection for refugees, this book argues that law has been instrumental in eliminating spaces of protection, not just from one’s persecutors but also from the grasp of sovereign power. By uncovering certain fundamental aspects of asylum as practised in the past and in present day social movements, namely its concern with defining space rather than people and its role as a space of resistance or otherness to sovereign law, this book demonstrates that asylum has historically been antagonistic to law and vice versa. In contrast, twentieth-century refugee law was constructed precisely to ensure the effective management and control over the movements of forced migrants. To illustrate the complex ways in which these two paradigms – asylum and refugee law – interact with one another, this book examines their historical development and concludes with in-depth studies of the Sanctuary Movement in the United States and the Sans-Papiers of France. The book will appeal to researchers and students of refugee law and refugee studies; legal and political philosophy; ancient, medieval and modern legal history; and sociology of political movements.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“El paradigma del cimarronaje es intrínsecamente sospechoso de lo legal, porque lo legal es el mayor sitio de producción de la subordinación colonial y poscolonial, y esto vale también para los refugiados (Behrman 2018;Picozza 2021); lo legal puede ser una herramienta táctica y contingente pero no es un fin a largo plazo.”
From Huida, cimarronaje y santuario: genealogías críticas para deseurocentrar la historia del refugio en el Atlántico Negro (2022) · cites this paper as Behrman 2018
Citations
Cited by
Picozza, F. (2022) · Scripta Nova. Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales · doi:10.1344/sn2022.26.36875 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Behrman, S.
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2018-06-18
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Law and Asylum: Space, Subject, Resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203730348
- The paper
- Behrman, S. (2018). Law and Asylum: Space, Subject, Resistance. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203730348
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.