The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Principles of Numerical Taxonomy
Abstract
PSYCHOLOGISTS who work in the field of classification, whether that of normal or abnormal personality, seldom concern themselves with the history of classification in physics and chemistry. This may be explained in terms of the obvious differences between animate and inanimate matter. However, they also very rarely seem to show any interest in the history of biological classification or taxonomy, and this is rather more difficult to understand because most of the problems which occur in psychology have also been dealt with by biologists and botanists at various stages, and a knowledge of their experiences may be of considerable use in dealing with our own problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.
(1987) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 · Cited by 59,715
(1967) · Cited by 23,719
Hierarchical Clustering Schemes
Johnson, S. C. (1967) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289588 · Cited by 4,897
The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure
Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R. A., Carter, W. B., & Gilson, B. S. (1981) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198108000-00001 · Cited by 4,619
Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data
Leek, J. T., Scharpf, R. B., Bravo, H. C., Simcha, D., Langmead, B., Johnson, W. E., Geman, D., Baggerly, K., & Irizarry, R. A. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2825 · Cited by 2,196
Metadata
- Venue
- Personality Structure and Measurement (Psychology Revivals)
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2013-11-26
- Pages
- 22-26
- OpenAlex
- W2118942683
- Cited by
- 2,990
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 240.03
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203766804-11
- The paper
- Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. (2013). Personality Structure and Measurement (Psychology Revivals). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203766804-11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
