The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Introduction to Applied Multivariate Analysis
Abstract
This comprehensive text introduces readers to the most commonly used multivariate techniques at an introductory, non-technical level. By focusing on the fundamentals, readers are better prepared for more advanced applied pursuits, particularly on topics that are most critical to the behavioral, social, and educational sciences. Analogies betwe
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For multivariate normality, the Mardia's coefficient in this study was 294.28, lesser than the requisite maximum of 37 × 39 = 1443, which was suggested should be lesser than (k [k + 2], k is the number of observed variables) [46].”
From An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior for the Modelling of Chinese Secondary School Students’ Intention to Learn Artificial Intelligence (2020) · cites this paper as [46]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–711 of 711
Youngs, P. A., Casa, T. M., Konstantopoulos, S., et al. (2026) · School Science and Mathematics · doi:10.1111/ssm.70050
Goodwin-Sak, C., Butler, W., & Meriac, J. P. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7152774
Yang, D., Tu, C. C., & Xie, S. (2026) · New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development · doi:10.1155/cad/9355268
Sen, C., & Özer, Z. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1879775
“Confirmatory factor analysis was performed using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method since the assumption of multivariate normality was met (Kline, 2016; Raykov and Marcoulides, 2008).”
InfluentialPiuze, A., Jennings, S., & Poulin‐Dubois, D. (2026) · Infancy · doi:10.1111/infa.70118
“Although one score, ± 3 standard deviations from the mean (Raykov and Marcoulides 2008), was identified for the variable Prepotent Reaction Time, the score was included because it was not considered sufficient cause for deletion.”
Taҫi, D., Mazzotta, R., Saurini, M., et al. (2026) · Nursing Reports · doi:10.3390/nursrep16090297
“For the RMSEA, values ≤ 0.05 suggested a close fit [36], those between 0.05 and 0.08 reflected reasonable approximation [37], and values ≥ 0.10 indicated inadequate fit [38].”
InfluentialDeveloping scales for training management styles of coaches
Turgut, A. E., Hazar, M., & SURAL, V. (2026) · International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching · doi:10.1177/17479541261478055
Exploring gaming addiction: Associations with impulsivity, FoMO, and gaming habits
GÜDEK, B., & Bahçekapılı, E. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-026-10107-7
“Second, bias-corrected bootstrap confidence intervals (5,000 resamples) were used for all direct and indirect effects, an approach that does not depend on the multivariate normality of the observed variables (Raykov & Marcoulides, 2008).”
Holcomb, E. M. (2013) · Human Biology
The chemistry and evolution of enzyme function: isomerases as a case study
Cuesta, S. M. (2014) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · doi:10.17863/cam.15989
Matrix Methods for Multiple Measures
Myers, W. L., & Patil, G. P. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3122-0_13
Metadata
- Authors
- Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A.
- ORCID
- Raykov, Tenko
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2008-03-10
- OpenAlex
- W619790032
- Cited by
- 716
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 5.12
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Routledge eBooks
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
- Keywords
- multivariate analysis, multivariate techniques, behavioral science, social sciences, educational sciences, statistical analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
