The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Perspectives on Cognitive Task Analysis
Abstract
Perspectives on cognitive task analysis , Perspectives on cognitive task analysis , کتابخانه الکترونیک و دیجیتال - آذرسا
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The 'fi eld of dreams ' fallacy is well-known in other domains where it is also referred to as the ' designer fallacy ' or ' designercentered design ' . 77”
From Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities (2010) · cites this paper as [77]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–114 of 114
Interactive computer assessment and analysis of students’ ability in scientific modeling
Lin, J., Zhang, L., Wei, W., Cheng, P.-H., & Chang, C. (2022) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education · doi:10.29333/ejmste/12682 · Cited by 1
Self-Report Methods for Cambridge Neurological Test Battery (CANTAB) strategies
Militello, L. G., Nemeth, K. J., Arbuckle, N. B., & Quill, L. L. (2010) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193121005402606
Self-citationUsing Knowledge to Become Profoundly Effective
Beaudoin, L. P. (2015)
Arezes, P. M. F. M., & de Carvalho, P. V. R. (2016) · Industrial and systems engineering · doi:10.1201/9781315370354-9
Using Task Analysis and Computational Cognitive Models to Design and Evaluate Interfaces
Boehm‐Davis, D. A. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511973017.039
Research and Design Trends for Exam Room Computing to Enhance Patient Centeredness
Saleem, J. J., Militello, L. G., Asan, O., Read, J. M., & Montague, E. N. H. (2021) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181321651034
Self-citationTang, J., Leu, G., & Abbass, H. A. (2019) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119527183.biblio
Multidimensional Task Analysis (MTA): A New Design Method for Human Factors Practitioners
Intriligator, J. M. (2022) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181322661534
Hung, C.-L., & Dai, M. D.-M. (2025) · The International Journal of Aerospace Psychology · doi:10.1080/24721840.2025.2464115
Nguyen, Q. H., Ming, D. K. Y., Luu, A. P., Chanh, H. Q., Tam, D. T. H., Thanh, T. N., Huy, V. X., Hernandez, B., Nuil, J. I. V., Paton, C., et al. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26565821
Cognitive Task Analysis as a Tool to Enhance Raters’ Reliability at Scoring a Writing Admission Test
Jiménez, J. C., & Ramírez, A. C. G. (2026) · Revista de Lenguas Modernas · doi:10.15517/y7x41780
Rementeria, S. (2026) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-026-10513-5
Bagarish, S., Arif, A. S., & Alharbi, O. M. (2026) · International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI) · doi:10.1145/3821581.3833111
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoffman, R. R., & Militello, L. G.
- ORCID
- Militello, Laura G.
- Venue
- Psychology Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Psychology Press
- Published
- 2008-09-09
- OpenAlex
- W2738143303
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Keywords
- cognitive task analysis, task analysis, human cognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
