The Psychology of Written Composition
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Promoting General Metacognitive Awareness
Schraw, G. (2001) · Neuropsychology and Cognition · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2243-8_1 · Cited by 1,245 · see citing works
Using sentence openers to foster student interaction in computer-mediated learning environments
Lazonder, A. W., Wilhelm, P., & Ootes, S. A. W. (2003) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/s0360-1315(03)00050-2 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Li, M., & Wilson, J. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16070519 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Cognitive load evaluation of handwriting using stroke-level features
Yu, K., Epps, J., & Chen, F. (2011) · Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces · doi:10.1145/1943403.1943481 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Learning paths in synthesis writing: Which learning path contributes most to which learning outcome?
Mateos, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., Martín, E., Cuevas, I., Van den Bergh, H., & Solari, M. (2020) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-020-09508-3 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Khampusaen, D. (2025) · LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network · doi:10.70730/pgcq9242 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Beyond the “Wow” Factor: Using Generative AI for Increasing Generative Sense-Making
Makransky, G., Shiwalia, B. M., Herlau, T., & Blurton, S. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10039-x · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Supporting learner agency in collaborative writing with generative <scp>AI</scp>
Kim, S., So, H., & Park, K. (2026) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.70015 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Ink and algorithm: Exploring temporal dynamics in generative <scp>AI</scp> ‐assisted writing
Yang, K., Cheng, Y., Zhao, L., Raković, M., Swiecki, Z., Gašević, D., & Chen, G. (2026) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.70031 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Human Intelligence, Creativity, and Wisdom in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence
Preiss, D. D., & Sternberg, R. J. (2025) · Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications · doi:10.2478/ctra-2025-0012 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Chen, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1906199 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Nefferdorf, E., & MacArthur, C. A. (2024) · Teaching English in the Two-Year College · doi:10.58680/tetyc2024513215
Generative AI, visual scaffolds, and metacognition in EFL writing
Chen, M.-R. A. (2026) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/73695 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2013-11-05
- OpenAlex
- W4300931234
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 22.12
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
- Keywords
- composition writing, writing process, psychology writing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
