Cited by 1,245Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Strategies and EpistemologiesMemory Processes and Influences

Promoting General Metacognitive Awareness

Schraw, Gregory·2001·Neuropsychology and Cognition

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-017-2243-8_1

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our results can be understood as evidence for the task generality of metacognitive skills, in contrast to the task-specific nature of metacognitive knowledge about cognitive and motivational strategies.

    “Furthermore, our results can be understood as evidence for the task generality of metacognitive skills (planning, monitoring, and evaluation;Schraw 2001), in contrast to the task-specific nature of metacognitive knowledge about cognitive and motivational strategies.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schraw, G.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
Schraw, Gregory
Venue
Neuropsychology and Cognition
Published
2001
Pages
3-16
ISSN
0927-0116 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154858773
Cited by
1,245
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 78 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 100 · 2013: 77 · 2012: 45
FWCI
36.06
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Neuropsychology and cognition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
metacognition, metacognitive awareness, knowledge of cognition, metacognitive regulation, metacognitive instruction, self-knowledge, self-regulation, learning environment, metacognitive skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review