The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sociocultural Theory and the Pedagogical Imperative in L2 Education: Vygotskian Praxis and the Research/Practice Divide
Abstract
Explicating clearly and concisely the full implication of a praxis-oriented language pedagogy, this book argues for an approach to language teaching grounded in a significant scientific theory of human learning—a stance that rejects the consumer approach to theory and the dichotomy between theory and practice that dominates SLA and language teaching. This approach is based on Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory, according to which the two activities are inherently connected so that each is necessarily rooted in the other; practice is the research laboratory where the theory is tested. From the perspective of language education, this is what is meant by the ‘pedagogical imperative.’ Sociocultural Theory and the Pedagogical Imperative in L2 Education• Elaborates a new approach to dealing with the relationship between theory and practice—an approach grounded in praxis—the dialectical unity of theory and practice• Presents an analysis of empirical research illustrating praxis-based principles in real language classrooms • Brings together cognitive linguistics and sociocultural theory ─ the former provides the theoretical knowledge of language required of praxis and the latter furnishes the theoretical principles of learning and development also called for in a praxis approach• Offers recommendations for redesigning teacher education programs Its timely focus on the theory-practice gap in language education and its original approach to bridging it put this book at the cutting edge of thinking about Vygotskian sociocultural theory in applied linguistics and SLA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Task-Based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108643689 · Cited by 407
Sociocultural Theory and L2 Development
Lantolf, J. P., Poehner, M. E., & Thorne, S. L. (2020) · Theories in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.4324/9780429503986-10 · Cited by 75
Self-citationThe Sociocognitive Imperative of L2 Pedagogy
Toth, P. D., & Davin, K. J. (2016) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12306 · Cited by 52
Rezai, A., Naserpour, A., & Rahimi, S. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2086575 · Cited by 16
Davin, K. J., & Kushki, A. (2022) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12473 · Cited by 9
Roehr-Brackin, K., Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A., Olivera-Smith, L., & Torres-Marín, M. T. (2021) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2021.1969404 · Cited by 9
Inal, S. (2021) · European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching · doi:10.46827/ejfl.v5i3.3625 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2014-03-05
- OpenAlex
- W3204571572
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.03
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.