Cited by 16Educational and Psychological AssessmentsStudent Assessment and FeedbackEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Online peer-dynamic assessment: an approach to boosting Iranian high school students’ writing skills: a mixed-methods study

Rezai, Afsheen, Naserpour, Azam, Rahimi, Siamak·2024·Interactive Learning Environments

Abstract

The purpose of this study is three-fold. First, to explore the effects of online peer-dynamic assessment (Peer-DA), rooted in the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) notion, on boosting Iranian high school students’ writing skills. Second, to disclose how online Peer-DA can lead to improving the participants’ writing skills. Third, to disclose their perceptions of the effectiveness of online Peer-DA in boosting writing skills. To these aims, one intact grade 11 class, including female students (n = 18) was selected randomly. The class went through pre-test, intervention, immediate post-test, and delayed post-test procedures. Additionally, the peers’ interactions were recorded meticulously and one-third of the students were selected randomly and invited to a focus-group interview. The data were analyzed through a repeated measure ANOVA, a microgenetic development approach, and a content analysis approach. Findings evidenced a significant improvement in the students’ writing skills on the immediate post-test and the delayed post-test. Also, the microgenetic development analysis documented that the contingent prompts led to improving the students’ writing performance. Besides, the findings of the focus group interview evidenced that the students had positive attitudes toward the online Peer-DA. Finally, a range of implications is offered for relevant stakeholders.ABBREVIATIONS: Peer-DA: Peer dynamic assessment; ZPD: Zone of proximal development; SCT: Sociocultural theory

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10494820.2022.2086575

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rezai, A., Naserpour, A., & Rahimi, S.
Affiliations
Ayatollah Boroujerdi University (IR)
Corresponding author
Rezai, Afsheen
Venue
Interactive Learning Environments
Published
2022-06-19
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
306-324
ISSN
  • 1049-4820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5191
OpenAlex
W4283120362
Cited by
16
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Interactive Learning Environments (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
writing skills, zone of proximal development, sociocultural theory, peer interaction, Iranian high school students, female students, student perceptions, writing instruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review