Cited by 651Media Studies and CommunicationSocial Media and PoliticsMedia Influence and Politics

An Introduction to Political Communication

McNair, Brian·2011·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

An Introduction to Political Communication introduces students to the complex relationship between politics, the media and democracy in the United Kingdom, United States and other contemporary societies. Brian McNair examines how politicians, trade unions, pressure groups, NGOs and terrorist organisations make use of the media. Individual chapters look at political media and their effects, the work of political advertising, marketing and public relations, and the communicative practices of organizations at all levels, from grass-root campaigning through to governments and international bodies. This fifth edition has been revised and updated to include: the 2008 US presidential election, and the early years of Barack Obama’s term the MPs’ expenses scandal in Britain, and the 2010 UK election campaign the growing role of bloggers and online pundits such as Guido Fawkes in the political agenda setting process the emergence of social media platforms such as Twitter, YouTube and Facebook, and their destabiising impact on the management of political crises all over the world, including the Iranian pro-reform protests of July 2009 and the Israeli atack on the anti-blockade flotilla of May 2010 the growing power of Wikileaks and other online information sources to challenge state control of classified information

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203828694

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Uncertainty can be a driver of a turn towards conspirational explanations, which in turn may erode trust in societal institutions.

    “By understanding conspiracy theories as purposeful communication about politics (McNair, 2011), our study can illustrate how uncertainty can be a driver of a turn towards conspirational explanations, which in turn may erode trust in societal institutions.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 651

Authors
McNair, B.
Corresponding author
McNair, Brian
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2011-03-10
OpenAlex
W1604653286
Cited by
651
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 31
FWCI
33.42
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
Keywords
political communication, media and politics, democracy, political advertising, political marketing, public relations, political campaigns, political parties, trade unions, interest groups, non-governmental organizations, terrorist organizations, political blogs, social media, political crisis management, political agenda setting, WikiLeaks, classified information, 2008 presidential election, Barack Obama, 2010 UK general election, United Kingdom, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review