The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The New Psychology of Leadership
Abstract
According to John Adair, the most important word in the leader's vocabulary is "we" and the least important word is "I". But if this is true, it raises one important question: why do psychological analyses of leadership always focus on the leader as an individual - as the great "I"? One answer is that theorists and practitioners have never properly understood the psychology of "we-ness". This book fills this gap by presenting a new psychology of leadership that is the result of two decades of research inspired by social identity and self-categorization theories. The book argues that to succeed, leaders need to create, champion, and embed a group identity in order to cultivate an understanding of 'us' of which they themselves are representative. It also shows how, by doing this, they can make a material difference to the groups, organizations, and societies that they lead. Written in an accessible and engaging style, the book examines a range of central theoretical and practical issues, including the nature of group identity, the basis of authority and legitimacy, the dynamics of justice and fairness, the determinants of followership and charisma, and the practice and politics of leadership. The book will appeal to academics, practitioners and students in social and organizational psychology, sociology, political science and anyone interested in leadership, influence and power.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A large body of research suggests that people tend to prefer leaders who cultivate a sense that 'we are all in this together' 200 .”
From Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) · cites this paper as [200]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,003 of 1,003
Kaltiainen, J. (2013) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEMS AND LEADERSHIP
Hıdıroğlu, D. (2021) · DergiPark (Istanbul University)
Pauw, A. D. (2013) · Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)
Metadata
- Authors
- Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Australian National University (AU)
- Venue
- Psychology Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Psychology Press
- Published
- 2010-09-13
- OpenAlex
- W4298432696
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 16.74
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Keywords
- leadership psychology, group identity, social identity theory, self-categorization theory, authority and legitimacy, fairness and justice, followership, charisma, collective identity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review