Assessing Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004 · Cited by 712 · see citing works
Self-efficacy as a predictor of commitment to the teaching profession: A meta-analysis
Chesnut, S. R., & Burley, H. (2015) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.001 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Leopold, C., & Leutner, D. (2015) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-014-9130-2 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E. L.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Venue
- Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2015-02-17
- OpenAlex
- W2501339331
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 16.84
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Education and Learning Interventions
- Keywords
- self-efficacy, student self-regulation, self-efficacy assessment, self-regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
