Cited by 712Student Assessment and FeedbackInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses

Open access
Panadero, Ernesto, Jonsson, Anders, Botella, Juan·2017·Educational Research Review

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-assessment can positively influence self-regulated learning and self-efficacy because it requires learners to compare their work against explicit criteria and to generate internal judgments before receiving or acting on external feedback.

    “Meta-analytic findings indicate that self-assessment can positively influence self-regulated learning and self-efficacy because it requires learners to compare their work against explicit criteria and to generate internal judgments before receiving or acting on external feedback”

    From Human-centered GenAI feedback design in higher education: a multisite experiment on direct, reflective, and hybrid approaches to scientific argumentation (2026) · cites this paper as Panadero et al., 2017

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is a positive correlation between self-assessment, self-regulated learning (SRL), and self-efficacy strategies.

    “e findings of these studies clearly showed that there is a positive correlation between self-assessment, self-regulated learning (SRL), and self-efficacy strategies.”
  • Self-assessment interventions have a direct and positive relationship with students' SRL strategies.

    “e results of their findings showed that self-assessment interventions have a direct and positive relationship with students' SRL strategies.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
  2. Lan, W. Y. (1996). The effects of self-monitoring on students' course performance, use of learning strategies, attitude, self-judgement ability, and knowledge representation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 64(2), 101-115.
  3. Wall, S. M. (1982). Effects of systematic self-monitoring and self-reinforcement in children's management of test performances. The Journal of Psychology, 111(1), 129-136.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J.
Affiliations
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Panadero, Ernesto
Venue
Educational Research Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
22
Pages
74-98
ISSN
1747-938X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2745915040
Cited by
712
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 93 · 2025: 103 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 113 · 2022: 118 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 2
FWCI
114.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Educational Research Review (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion)
  • Biblos-e Archivo (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad via Spanish Ramón y Cajal programme (RYC-2013-13469)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
self-assessment, student self-regulation, self-efficacy, self-monitoring, gender differences, learning strategies, student motivation, educational intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review