The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Psychology and language
Abstract
Language is the hardest of Psychological topics on which to write a coherent brief account. Language researchers approach it with varied agendas and assumptions, while it often forces its attention on psychologists concerned with other topics. It is, moreover, the most multi-disciplinary of subjects; linguistics itself, philosophy, anthropology, sociology, literary criticism, neurology and psychiatry, for instance, all have their legitimate interests (see Table 20.1).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers.
Schwarz, N. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.2.93 · Cited by 2,846
Psychological status of the script concept.
Abelson, R. P. (1981) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.36.7.715 · Cited by 1,743
Gilbert, D. T. (1991) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.46.2.107 · Cited by 1,515
On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect.
Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.3 · Cited by 1,481
Verbal and Nonverbal Communication of Deception
Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60369-x · Cited by 1,341
Metadata
- Venue
- Putting Psychology in its Place
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2009-12-16
- Pages
- 309-328
- OpenAlex
- W2999853468
- Cited by
- 941
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 75.91
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychology and language. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203854600-31
- The paper
- Psychology and language. (2009). Putting Psychology in its Place. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203854600-31
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
