Cited by 1,743Categorization, perception, and languageCognitive and psychological constructs researchMemory Processes and Influences

Psychological status of the script concept.

Abelson, Robert P.·1981·American Psychologist

Abstract

Suggests that there has been growing interest within several subfields of psychology in the schematic nature of mental representations of real-world objects and events. One simple form of schema is the “script,” embodying knowledge of stereotyped event sequences. The present author traces applicatio

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.36.7.715

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Students' successful use of the skill in other similar situations to guess the meaning of unfamiliar vocabulary could be attributed to learning, since similar situations activate scripts.

    “Moreover, students' claim to have successfully used the skill in other similar situations to guess the meaning of unfamiliar vocabulary could also be attributed to learning since similar situations activate scripts-concepts learned and rehearsed through an understanding of goals, causation, and plans of action (Abelson, 1981;Schank & Abelson, 1977).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abelson, R. P.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Abelson, Robert P.
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
1981-07
Volume
36
Issue
7
Pages
715-729
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2051017435
Cited by
1,743
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 49
FWCI
51.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cognitive and psychological constructs research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
scripts, schemas, mental representation, event knowledge, cognitive psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review