The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Taking Effective Prevention to Scale
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Programs like SFP 10-14 are unlikely to have a measurable impact on critical social problems if they are not sustained beyond initial start-up grant dollars.
“Although wide dissemination is important, programs like SFP 10-14 are unlikely to have a measurable impact on the critical social problems of today if they are not sustained beyond the initial start-up grant dollars allocated to promote their adoption [13].”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sustaining Evidence-Based Prevention Programs: Correlates in a Large-Scale Dissemination Initiative
Cooper, B. R., Bumbarger, B. K., & Moore, J. E. (2015) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-013-0427-1 · Cited by 117
Self-citationCooper, B. R., Hill, L. G., Parker, L., Jenkins, G. J., Shrestha, G., & Funaiole, A. (2022) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-022-00303-4 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Bumbarger, B. K., Perkins, D. F., & Greenberg, M. T.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Venue
- Handbook of Youth Prevention Science
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2015-02-17
- OpenAlex
- W2477375910
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 7.13
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Public Health Policies and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- prevention, scale-up, program implementation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
