Globalizing Education Policy
Abstract
Rizvi and Lingard's account of the global politics of education is thoughtful, complex and compelling. It is the first really comprehensive discussion and analysis of global trends in education policy, their effects - structural and individual - and resistance to them. In the enormous body of writing on globalisation this book stands out and will become a basic text in education policy courses around the world. - Stephen J Ball, Karl Mannheim Professor of Sociology of Education, Institute of Education, University of London, UK In what ways have the processes of globalization reshaped the educational policy terrain? How might we analyse education policies located within this new terrain, which is at once local, national, regional and global? In Globalizing Education Policy, the authors explore the key global drivers of policy change in education, and suggest that these do not operate in the same way in all nation-states. They examine the transformative effects of globalization on the discursive terrain within which educational policies are developed and enacted, arguing that this terrain is increasingly informed by a range of neo-liberal precepts which have fundamentally changed the ways in which we think about educational governance. They also suggest that whilst in some countries these precepts are resisted, to some extent, they have nonetheless become hegemonic, and provide an overview of some critical issues in educational policy to which this hegemonic view of globalizati…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prescription along curricular, pedagogical, and behavioural lines advances conservative and technical-instrumental understandings of education that circulate through policy networks.
“Such prescription along curricular, pedagogical, and behavioural lines advances conservative and technical-instrumental understandings of education that circulate through policy networks”
From A prescriptive continuum analytical framework for measuring school curriculum structure (2026) · cites this paper as Rizvi and Lingard 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Williamson, B. (2016) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/02680939.2015.1035758 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Shahjahan, R. A. (2011) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/02680939.2010.508176 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Gulson, K. N., & Webb, P. T. (2017) · Research in Education · doi:10.1177/0034523717723385 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
The Korean national curriculum for physical education: a shift from edge to central subject
Lee, K.-C., & Cho, S.-M. (2014) · Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy · doi:10.1080/17408989.2014.915299 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Fautley, M. (2019) · Arts Education Policy Review · doi:10.1080/10632913.2018.1532369 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Hulme, M. (2026) · Educational Action Research · doi:10.1080/09650792.2026.2626541 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Such prescription along curricular, pedagogical, and behavioural lines advances conservative and technical-instrumental understandings of education that circulate through policy networks (Rizvi and Lingard 2009).”
- Authors
- Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2009-12-04
- OpenAlex
- W1574015018
- Cited by
- 2,050
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 57 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 131 · 2019: 149 · 2018: 152 · 2017: 164 · 2016: 202 · 2015: 143 · 2014: 181 · 2013: 146 · 2012: 101
- FWCI
- 119.43
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Higher Education Governance and Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Global Education Systems and Policies
- Keywords
- globalization, education policy, neoliberalism, education governance, policy analysis, devolution, decentralization, educational equity, access to education, women's education, course program, English language teaching, technology pedagogy, high-stakes testing, resistance to globalization, hegemony
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review