Cited by 2,050Global Educational Policies and ReformsHigher Education Governance and DevelopmentGlobal Education Systems and Policies

Globalizing Education Policy

Rizvi, Fazal, Lingard, Bob·2009·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

Rizvi and Lingard's account of the global politics of education is thoughtful, complex and compelling. It is the first really comprehensive discussion and analysis of global trends in education policy, their effects - structural and individual - and resistance to them. In the enormous body of writing on globalisation this book stands out and will become a basic text in education policy courses around the world. - Stephen J Ball, Karl Mannheim Professor of Sociology of Education, Institute of Education, University of London, UK In what ways have the processes of globalization reshaped the educational policy terrain? How might we analyse education policies located within this new terrain, which is at once local, national, regional and global? In Globalizing Education Policy, the authors explore the key global drivers of policy change in education, and suggest that these do not operate in the same way in all nation-states. They examine the transformative effects of globalization on the discursive terrain within which educational policies are developed and enacted, arguing that this terrain is increasingly informed by a range of neo-liberal precepts which have fundamentally changed the ways in which we think about educational governance. They also suggest that whilst in some countries these precepts are resisted, to some extent, they have nonetheless become hegemonic, and provide an overview of some critical issues in educational policy to which this hegemonic view of globalizati…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203867396

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prescription along curricular, pedagogical, and behavioural lines advances conservative and technical-instrumental understandings of education that circulate through policy networks.

    “Such prescription along curricular, pedagogical, and behavioural lines advances conservative and technical-instrumental understandings of education that circulate through policy networks”

    From A prescriptive continuum analytical framework for measuring school curriculum structure (2026) · cites this paper as Rizvi and Lingard 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2009-12-04
OpenAlex
W1574015018
Cited by
2,050
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 131 · 2019: 149 · 2018: 152 · 2017: 164 · 2016: 202 · 2015: 143 · 2014: 181 · 2013: 146 · 2012: 101
FWCI
119.43
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Higher Education Governance and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Global Education Systems and Policies
Keywords
globalization, education policy, neoliberalism, education governance, policy analysis, devolution, decentralization, educational equity, access to education, women's education, course program, English language teaching, technology pedagogy, high-stakes testing, resistance to globalization, hegemony

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review