Cited by 52Physical Education and PedagogyPhysical Education and Sports StudiesPhysical Education and Training Studies

The Korean national curriculum for physical education: a shift from edge to central subject

Lee, Ki-Cheon, Cho, Soon-Mook·2014·Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy

Abstract

Background: Within the last half century, the Korean national curriculum has undergone seven periods of reform, each at intervals of just 6–8 years. The most recent ‘seventh curriculum’ was developed in 1997, and implemented in schools from 2001. Continual curriculum change has been driven by national and social needs, keeping in line with the philosophical and theoretical positions popular in the field of education. The main theme for the seventh curriculum that sets it apart from previous curriculum reform is it is a ‘differentiated curriculum.'Purpose: This study is intended to reflect and analyze the historical change of the Korean National Curriculum for Physical Education (KNCPE) over the past 60 years, covering the first through to the seventh curriculum reform phases, and then to propose the shaping and future directions of physical education (PE) national curriculum in Korea in a context of demonstrable global academic achievement among other neoliberal concerns.Discussion and conclusions: Fifteen years have passed since the inception of this ‘new’ curriculum. A number of studies have been conducted to investigate its educational effects. Nevertheless, the results are unclear and many problems exist in this area. First, PE is still regarded as a minor subject area compared with other subjects such as mathematics or science. Second, major philosophies and principles employed to construct the framework for movement activities are heavily based on Western concepts and approaches. And lastly, many students are still physically unfit and passive in their daily life suggesting that the curriculum messages have not been effective. Now, further change is needed to refocus the PE curriculum, arguing that PE in Korea is at a curriculum cross-roads.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17408989.2014.915299

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zimbabwe's grades for School, Community and Environment, and Government improved from the previous Report Card due to recent policy implementations and government commitments.

    “In comparison with the previous Report Card in Zimbabwe, the grades for School, Community and Environment, and Government, have improved due to recent policy implementations and commitments made by the government to promote physical activity and nutritional status among Zimbabwean children and youth.50”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, K.-C., & Cho, S.-M.
Affiliations
,
Venue
Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy
Published
2014-05-15
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
522-532
ISSN
  • 1362-7120 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-8989
  • 1742-5786
OpenAlex
W2061160007
Cited by
52
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6
FWCI
10.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy (publishedVersion)
Funders
Korea University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Physical Education and Sports Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
Keywords
physical education curriculum, national curriculum reform, curriculum history, differentiated curriculum, curriculum centralization, physical fitness, neoliberalism in education, curriculum policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review