The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Handbook of Formative Assessment
Abstract
Preface Section I. Foundations of Formative Assessment 1. An Introduction to Formative Assessment: History, Characteristics, and Challenges, Gregory J. Cizek 2. An Integrative Summary of the Research Literature and Implications for a New Theory of Formative Assessment, Dylan Wiliam 3. The Practical Implications of Educational Aims and Contexts for Formative Assessment, James McMillan Section II. Formative Assessment Methods and Practice 4. Peers as a Source of Formative Assessment, Keith J. Topping 5. Formative Assessment Applications of Culminating Demonstrations of Mastery, Jill Davidson and Jay Feldman 6. Students as the Definitive Source of Formative Assessment: Academic Self-Assessment and the Self-Regulation of Learning, Heidi L. Andrade 7. Formative Assessment: The Contribution of Benjamin S. Bloom, Thomas R. Guskey 8. Technology-Aided Formative Assessment of Learning: New Developments and Applications, Michael K. Russell 9. Formative Assessment, Motivation, and Science Learning, Maria Araceli Ruiz-Primo, Erin Marie Furtak, Carlos Ayala, Yue Yin, and Richard J. Shavelson 10. Research and Strategies for Adapting Formative Assessment for Students with Special Needs, Stephen N. Elliott, Ryan J. Kettler, Peter A. Beddow, and Alexander Kurz 11. Research and Recommendations for Formative Assessment with English Language Learners, Jamal Abedi 12. Moment-by-moment Formative Assessment of Second Language Development: ESOL Professionals at Work, Carla Meskill 13. Formative Assessment Practices that Maximize Learning for Students At-Risk, Gerunda B. Hughes 14. Essential Formative Assessment Competencies for Teachers and School Leaders, Rick Stiggins 15. Research on Characteristics of Effective Professional Development Programs for Enhancing Educators' Skills in Formative Assessment, M. Christina Schneider and Bruce Randel Section III: Challenges and Future Directions for Formative Assessment 16. Mixing It Up: Combining Sources of Classroom Achievement Information for Formative and Summative Purposes, Susan M. Brookhart 17. Psychometric Challenges and Opportunities in Implementing Formative Assessment, Walter D. Way, Robert P. Dolan, and Paul Nichols 18. Strategies and Policies for Incorporating Formative Assessment into Comprehensive and Balanced State Assessment Systems, Doug A. Rindone and Duncan MacQuarrie 19. Keeping the Focus, Expanding the Vision, Maintaining the Balance: Preserving and Enhancing Formative Assessment in Nebraska, Chris W. Gallagher 20. Summing Up and Moving Forward: Key Challenges and Future Directions for Research and Development in Formative Assessment, Heidi L. Andrade About the Authors Author Index Subject Index
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Both formative assessment and AfL share the same central aim: to improve student learning through the systematic use of assessment evidence to guide instructional decisions and support learner improvement [17][18][19][20][21][22].”
From Formative assessment and feedback in medical education: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 189 (2026) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What is assessment for learning
Wiliam, D. (2011) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001 · Cited by 1,282
Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6 · Cited by 1,040
The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review
Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002 · Cited by 839
Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization
Xu, Y., & Brown, G. (2016) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010 · Cited by 796
Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004 · Cited by 712
Metadata
- Authors
- Andrade, H.
- Corresponding author
- Andrade, Heidi
- ORCID
- Andrade, Heidi
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2010-04-02
- OpenAlex
- W600941897
- Cited by
- 663
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 22.62
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- formative assessment, classroom assessment, student self-assessment, peer assessment, academic self-regulation, student motivation, science learning, English language learners, second language development, special needs students, at-risk students, teacher professional development, state assessment systems, summative assessment, Bloom's taxonomy, educational aims
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review