The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NEWS FRAMING THEORY AND RESEARCH
Abstract
Artists know that the frame placed around a painting can affect how viewers interpret and react to the painting itself. As a result, some artists take great care in how they present their work, choosing a frame that they hope will help audiences see the image in just the right way. Journalists-often subconsciously-engage in essentially the same process when they decide how to describe the political world. They choose images and words that have the power to influence how audiences interpret and evaluate issues and policies. The simplicity of this analogy belies the complexity of the process and effects of framing in the news, however. Framing in the field of communication has been characterized by equal degrees of conceptual obliqueness and operational inconsistency (Scheufele & Tewksbury, 2007). Part of this vagueness at different levels stems from the fact that framing researchers have often approached the theory very inductively and examined framing as a phenomenon without careful explication of the theoretical premises and their operational implications.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The framing of a problem (and its associated 'solutions') has a powerful effect on how people - and thus the public as those who may benefit, or be harmed by an AI system - perceive the world and act in it, e.g., [42].”
From AI for the Common Good?! Pitfalls, challenges, and ethics pen-testing (2019) · cites this paper as [42]
Citations
Cites
How Interest Groups Attempt to Shape Public Opinion with Competing News Frames
Andsager, J. L. (2000) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/107769900007700308 · Cited by 168
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Science communication as political communication
Scheufele, D. A. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1317516111 · Cited by 313
Self-citationInternet of Things (IoT) adoption barriers of smart cities’ waste management: An Indian context
Sharma, M., Joshi, S., Kannan, D., Govindan, K., Singh, R. K., & Purohit, H. C. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122047 · Cited by 311
The Mediating Role of Emotions
Lecheler, S. K., Bos, L., & Vliegenthart, R. (2015) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699015596338 · Cited by 227
Media's influence on immigration attitudes: An intergroup threat theory approach
Seate, A. A., & Mastro, D. E. (2015) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2015.1068433 · Cited by 163
What a Difference a Day Makes? The Effects of Repetitive and Competitive News Framing Over Time
Lecheler, S. K., & de Vreese, C. H. (2013) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650212470688 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Tewksbury, D. H., & Scheufele, D. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Venue
- Media Effects
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2009-01-13
- Pages
- 33-49
- OpenAlex
- W70510874
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 28 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 33.09
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
- Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
- Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
- Keywords
- news framing, framing theory, political communication, news media, audience interpretation, framing effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review