CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 290Academic Publishing and Open AccessNews Media Framing and Political CommunicationScience Education and Perceptions

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Of deficits, deviations and dialogues: Theories of public communication of science

Massimiano Bucchi·2008·Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology
DOI 10.4324/9780203928240-11
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Theoretical and empirical research in public communication of science has a relatively short history compared with the long-standing practice of communicating science to the public. It was only in 1992, for instance, that a dedicated scholarly journal, Public Understanding of Science, was founded. This chapter seeks to contribute to the theoretical understanding of science communication by, first, outlining the key elements of the traditional conception, still implicitly or explicitly widespread within science communication practice and policy, of public communication of science. I then review some of the studies that have challenged different facets of this conception. Finally, I raise the question of which alternative models can best help us understand the contemporary interactions between scientific knowledge and the general public.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203928240-11

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Items 101–200 of 290

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bucchi, M.
Corresponding author
Massimiano Bucchi
ORCID
Massimiano Bucchi
Venue
Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2008-06-03
Pages
71-90
DOI
10.4324/9780203928240-11
OpenAlex
W2889670235
Cited by
280
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.83
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
Keywords
science communication, deficit model, public understanding of science, science and the public, science communication policy, science communication practice, public engagement with science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review