The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods
Abstract
Geography, is useful well beyond this discipline, as it provides a welcome review of Participatory Action Research (PAR).In three major sections, beginning and ending with 'Reflections' that bracket the 'Action' section, this edited collection provides a timely overview of the current status of this methodology, as well as many useful examples of applying PAR as a research process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Geographies of age: thinking relationally
Hopkins, P., & Pain, R. (2007) · Area · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00750.x · Cited by 512
Agroecology as a Transdisciplinary, Participatory, and Action-Oriented Approach
Méndez, V. E., Bacon, C. M., & Cohen, R. (2013) · Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.1080/10440046.2012.736926 · Cited by 438
Globalized fear? Towards an emotional geopolitics
Pain, R. (2009) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132508104994 · Cited by 438
De Las Nueces, D., Hacker, K., DiGirolamo, A., & Hicks, L. S. (2012) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01386.x · Cited by 400
Cuerpo-Territorio: A Decolonial Feminist Geographical Method for the Study of Embodiment
Zaragocin, S., & Caretta, M. A. (2021) · Annals of the American Association of Geographers · doi:10.1080/24694452.2020.1812370 · Cited by 259
Metadata
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203933671
- The paper
- Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods. (2007). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203933671
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
